Infrastructure Funding Initiative

Share Infrastructure Funding Initiative on Facebook Share Infrastructure Funding Initiative on Twitter Share Infrastructure Funding Initiative on Linkedin Email Infrastructure Funding Initiative link

About this project

The Infrastructure Funding Initiative (formerly the Off-Site Levy Update) is a collaborative decision-making process with City administration and the Off-Site Levy Advisory Committee (OSL-AC). In early 2025, an Off-site Levy Advisory Committee was established (see Terms of Reference). This committee represents key stakeholders who would be responsible for paying off-site levies (engaging these affected groups in Bylaw development is a stipulation of the Municipal Government Act).


PROJECT PURPOSE:

To develop a decision-making framework (infrastructure delivery philosophy) for growth-related infrastructure that will guide financing and funding of growth related infrastructure in the future.

SCOPE OF PROJECT:

The scope of this project is to discuss how water, sewer, storm, and road infrastructure should be funded. A municipality may also use off-site levies for the construction of community recreation facilities, fire halls, police stations, and libraries, however; the City of Medicine Hat currently funds these facilities through general taxation.

  • The initiative consists of four phases with the goal of modernizing how Medicine Hat plans for and funds off-site water, sewer, storm, and road infrastructure tied to growth.
  • This project was repositioned as an Infrastructure Funding Initiative to better reflect the broader objectives and to acknowledge that multiple funding tools may be considered to deliver essential infrastructure required for growth. The project will produce an Infrastructure Delivery Philosophy that will recommend a funding approach, which may include a revised Off-site Levy Bylaw or alternative tools.
  • Until this project is complete, the current rates are to remain in effect until Council approves a new approach to off-site infrastructure funding.


Why we're doing this

In mid-2024 an Off-site Levy Bylaw update (mostly inflationary) was completed by Planning and Development Services for City Council consideration. Council opted to hold a non-statutory Public Hearing on September 3, 2024, to hear from the Public and affected stakeholders.

Stakeholders' feedback indicated that their questions had not been fully answered regarding the preparation methodology, project costs, and benefiting areas. They requested a deeper review before a new bylaw was proposed.

As part of the submissions to the non-statutory Public Hearing, the Chamber of Commerce submitted a letter requesting an Advisory Committee (or a similar group) be established to address outstanding questions and revisit the methodology used to prepare the draft Off-site Levy Bylaw.

In September 2024, a commitment was made to Stakeholders that a recommendation for funding off-site infrastructure would not be presented to Council for consideration until all questions were answered, regardless of the effort necessary to determine those answers.



Project goals

PRIMARY GOAL:

To demonstrate that stakeholder questions have been answered, that feedback has been documented and acknowledged, and that a general consensus has been achieved on the Infrastructure Delivery Philosophy and Draft Bylaw.

SUPPORTING GOALS:

Optimize existing servicing capacity. This will reduce near-term capital spending and support long-term financial sustainability.

Align funding with actual growth trends and predictions. This will ensure infrastructure investment matches realistic demand.

Provide clarity and predictability. This will provide the development community with certainty about where growth is anticipated and the how costs are allocated.



Project phases

There are four phases to this project.

Phase 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PHILOSOPHY

Develop an infrastructure delivery philosophy for growth-related infrastructure that will guide financing and funding of infrastructure in the future.

Phase 2 - DEVELOP INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING APPROACH

Identify the infrastructure to be included in the infrastructure funding program, define the associated approach and methodology, and engage/educate on the program and its alignment with the infrastructure delivery philosophy.

Phase 3 - DRAFT INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING BYLAW

Ensure alignment and consider gathered feedback to create an infrastructure funding program that is clear, transparent and logic-based, and will inform the final infrastructure funding bylaw.

Phase 4 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING BYLAW IMPLEMENTATION

Implementation of the Bylaw



Who's involved?

> See more details about who's involved



What we've heard so far

Key themes from meetings and workshops to date:

  • Transparency & Methodology - requests for a clearer explanation of how projects are selected, costed, and allocated to benefitting areas.
  • Financial Clarity - requests for a full accounting of past collections, project expenditures and outstanding obligations.
  • Predictability of Rates - the industry wants stable, predictable levy rates tied to realistic growth assumptions.



Advisory Committee influence in this project

The Off-site Levy Advisory Committee (OSL-AC) was formed in response to stakeholder requests and are key to reviewing the methodology, project lists, staging, benefitting areas and shaping the overall recommendations before anything is presented to Council.

City Administration committed to not presenting a recommendation to Council until all stakeholder questions are answered and industry support is secured.

Off-site Levies (OSLs) are one potential mechanism for funding growth-related infrastructure. If OSLs are selected as part of the City's funding strategy, the Municipal Government Act (MGA) requires the City to provide the following:

  • any information or data the municipality relied upon;
  • the calculations that were performed to determine the amount of the levy;
  • any assumptions the municipality made in calculating the levy, including, without limitation, any information, data or assumptions the municipality used in models to complete calculations.



How to get involved


1) Review the Project Status Report: Key Assumptions / Strategy Update

2) Post a question about the report. All submitted questions will be compiled and the project team will prepare responses for discussion at our next in-person meeting

3) Do a survey - Complete our 5-minute engagement experience survey. Your feedback will help us improve the advisory committee experience, including attendance during construction season. Survey closes March 22 (end of day).


About this project

The Infrastructure Funding Initiative (formerly the Off-Site Levy Update) is a collaborative decision-making process with City administration and the Off-Site Levy Advisory Committee (OSL-AC). In early 2025, an Off-site Levy Advisory Committee was established (see Terms of Reference). This committee represents key stakeholders who would be responsible for paying off-site levies (engaging these affected groups in Bylaw development is a stipulation of the Municipal Government Act).


PROJECT PURPOSE:

To develop a decision-making framework (infrastructure delivery philosophy) for growth-related infrastructure that will guide financing and funding of growth related infrastructure in the future.

SCOPE OF PROJECT:

The scope of this project is to discuss how water, sewer, storm, and road infrastructure should be funded. A municipality may also use off-site levies for the construction of community recreation facilities, fire halls, police stations, and libraries, however; the City of Medicine Hat currently funds these facilities through general taxation.

  • The initiative consists of four phases with the goal of modernizing how Medicine Hat plans for and funds off-site water, sewer, storm, and road infrastructure tied to growth.
  • This project was repositioned as an Infrastructure Funding Initiative to better reflect the broader objectives and to acknowledge that multiple funding tools may be considered to deliver essential infrastructure required for growth. The project will produce an Infrastructure Delivery Philosophy that will recommend a funding approach, which may include a revised Off-site Levy Bylaw or alternative tools.
  • Until this project is complete, the current rates are to remain in effect until Council approves a new approach to off-site infrastructure funding.


Why we're doing this

In mid-2024 an Off-site Levy Bylaw update (mostly inflationary) was completed by Planning and Development Services for City Council consideration. Council opted to hold a non-statutory Public Hearing on September 3, 2024, to hear from the Public and affected stakeholders.

Stakeholders' feedback indicated that their questions had not been fully answered regarding the preparation methodology, project costs, and benefiting areas. They requested a deeper review before a new bylaw was proposed.

As part of the submissions to the non-statutory Public Hearing, the Chamber of Commerce submitted a letter requesting an Advisory Committee (or a similar group) be established to address outstanding questions and revisit the methodology used to prepare the draft Off-site Levy Bylaw.

In September 2024, a commitment was made to Stakeholders that a recommendation for funding off-site infrastructure would not be presented to Council for consideration until all questions were answered, regardless of the effort necessary to determine those answers.



Project goals

PRIMARY GOAL:

To demonstrate that stakeholder questions have been answered, that feedback has been documented and acknowledged, and that a general consensus has been achieved on the Infrastructure Delivery Philosophy and Draft Bylaw.

SUPPORTING GOALS:

Optimize existing servicing capacity. This will reduce near-term capital spending and support long-term financial sustainability.

Align funding with actual growth trends and predictions. This will ensure infrastructure investment matches realistic demand.

Provide clarity and predictability. This will provide the development community with certainty about where growth is anticipated and the how costs are allocated.



Project phases

There are four phases to this project.

Phase 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PHILOSOPHY

Develop an infrastructure delivery philosophy for growth-related infrastructure that will guide financing and funding of infrastructure in the future.

Phase 2 - DEVELOP INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING APPROACH

Identify the infrastructure to be included in the infrastructure funding program, define the associated approach and methodology, and engage/educate on the program and its alignment with the infrastructure delivery philosophy.

Phase 3 - DRAFT INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING BYLAW

Ensure alignment and consider gathered feedback to create an infrastructure funding program that is clear, transparent and logic-based, and will inform the final infrastructure funding bylaw.

Phase 4 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING BYLAW IMPLEMENTATION

Implementation of the Bylaw



Who's involved?

> See more details about who's involved



What we've heard so far

Key themes from meetings and workshops to date:

  • Transparency & Methodology - requests for a clearer explanation of how projects are selected, costed, and allocated to benefitting areas.
  • Financial Clarity - requests for a full accounting of past collections, project expenditures and outstanding obligations.
  • Predictability of Rates - the industry wants stable, predictable levy rates tied to realistic growth assumptions.



Advisory Committee influence in this project

The Off-site Levy Advisory Committee (OSL-AC) was formed in response to stakeholder requests and are key to reviewing the methodology, project lists, staging, benefitting areas and shaping the overall recommendations before anything is presented to Council.

City Administration committed to not presenting a recommendation to Council until all stakeholder questions are answered and industry support is secured.

Off-site Levies (OSLs) are one potential mechanism for funding growth-related infrastructure. If OSLs are selected as part of the City's funding strategy, the Municipal Government Act (MGA) requires the City to provide the following:

  • any information or data the municipality relied upon;
  • the calculations that were performed to determine the amount of the levy;
  • any assumptions the municipality made in calculating the levy, including, without limitation, any information, data or assumptions the municipality used in models to complete calculations.



How to get involved


1) Review the Project Status Report: Key Assumptions / Strategy Update

2) Post a question about the report. All submitted questions will be compiled and the project team will prepare responses for discussion at our next in-person meeting

3) Do a survey - Complete our 5-minute engagement experience survey. Your feedback will help us improve the advisory committee experience, including attendance during construction season. Survey closes March 22 (end of day).


  • Who's involved?

    Share Who's involved? on Facebook Share Who's involved? on Twitter Share Who's involved? on Linkedin Email Who's involved? link
    supporting image

    INVOLVED PARTIES:

    1) City Council - provides strategic direction, public accountability, reviews the framework and funding options, weighs fiscal implications, and decides whether to adopt any bylaw or funding approach once stakeholder questions are addressed and recommendations supported (Final Approval).

    2) Off-Site Levy Advisory Committee (OSL-AC) - a mix of individuals from the development community, engaged through workshops and meetings:

    • BILD
    • Benchmark Geomatics
    • Box Springs Business Park
    • Chamber of Commerce
    • Coulee Ridge
    • Lacey Homes
    • Landmark Properties
    • Meadowlands Development
    • Medicine Hat Economic Development
    • Planning and Development Services
    • WSP

    3) Industry Stakeholders - industry, developers and the advisory committee shape methodology, staging and the final recommendations.

    3) Taxpayers - Considering that off-site levies can impact tax rates, taxpayers are considered affected stakeholders.



    OTHER ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS:

    Technical Analysis - growth projections, servicing capacity, project status, benefitting areas, and updated technical studies.

    Financial Review - detailed accounting of amounts collected, projects paid, outstanding obligations, interest and debentures to ensure transparency and accurate cost allocation.

    Policy and Legal Context - options under the Municipal Government Act (MGA), risk assessment (municipal vs. developer vs. shared funding), and appeal risk under the Land and Property Rights Tribunal.



    ADMINISTRATIVE ROLE:

    City Administration - leads and coordinates the Infrastructure Funding Initiative, produces the technical and financial analysis, hosts stakeholder engagements, drafts the Infrastructure Delivery Philosophy and Bylaw or alternative options, prepares implementation and risk management plans.

    Our City-led project team has enlisted Urban Systems for their assistance with this project. Urban Systems is a proven consulting firm which as worked successfully with numerous municipalities across Alberta. Encompassing a broad range of expertise, our project team is passionate about determining the best "made in Medicine Hat" solution regarding the funding of off-site infrastructure, moving forward.

  • Goals and values

    Share Goals and values on Facebook Share Goals and values on Twitter Share Goals and values on Linkedin Email Goals and values link
    supporting image

    PRIMARY PROJECT GOAL:

    Demonstrate that stakeholder questions have been answered, that feedback has been documented and acknowledged, and that a general consensus has been achieved on the Infrastructure Delivery Philosophy and Draft Bylaw.


    SUPPORTING GOALS:

    Optimize existing servicing capacity. This will reduce near-term capital spending and support long-term financial sustainability.

    Align funding with actual growth trends and predictions. This will ensure infrastructure investment matches realistic demand.

    Provide clarity and predictability. This will provide the development community with certainty about where growth is anticipated and the how costs are allocated.


    ENGAGEMEMENT GOALS:

    Trust and relationship building between the City and development community.

    Committee perspective is heard.

    Consensus on infrastructure delivery philosophy.

    All options are explored.




    PROJECT VALUES:

    Curiosity and Receptiveness Stay open minded actively listen, and encourage deeper conversations.

    Respect and Sensitivity Understand the community’s history and perspectives without being dismissive. Acknowledge the long-standing relationships and distrust which has emerged from concerns about transparency and fairness with previous off-site levy programs.

    Transparent Communication Ensure relevant information/processes that could impact stakeholders are shared with them.

    Avoid Defensiveness - Be open to new ideas, avoid defensiveness, consider and take accountability for the partial truth in what’s being said.

    Stakeholder Alignment - Align schedules, logistics, expectations and direction of Council, Exec Leadership, Offsite Levy Advisory Committee and Administration.

    Clarity - Communicate clearly on the process and intended outcomes.

    Inform and Educate - Ongoing dialogue with the committee, exec leadership, and Council regarding municipal financing and the use of off-site levies as a tool to achieving Council’s/the community’s strategic vision.

    Support and Communicate The importance of working partnerships, supporting one another, and open lines of communication, especially when times get tough.

Page last updated: 06 Mar 2026, 09:34 AM